---

Cloud-based accounting systems have become popular for businesses of all sizes, but what is the true value of being in the cloud and does it make life easier or more expensive and complex? Here’s a breakdown of the main pros and cons:

Pros of Cloud-Based Accounting Systems

1. Accessibility and Flexibility

   • Access your financial data anytime, anywhere with an internet connection, which is ideal for remote work and multi-location teams.
   • Compatible with various devices, including laptops, smartphones, and tablets.

2. Real-Time Financial Information

   • Real-time updates enable more accurate decision-making as financial data is immediately available and reflects the latest transactions.

3. Automatic Updates and Maintenance

   • The software provider typically handles updates and maintenance, ensuring you always have the latest version without the hassle of manual installations.

4. Enhanced Security

   • Cloud providers often invest heavily in security, including encryption, regular backups, and advanced authentication methods, which many small businesses would struggle to implement on their own.

5. Scalability

   • Cloud solutions often offer scalable plans, allowing businesses to upgrade or downgrade according to their needs without investing in new hardware.

6. Cost Savings

   • Reduced upfront costs since there’s no need for physical servers or IT infrastructure. Typically, pricing is based on a subscription model, spreading the cost over time.

7. Integration with Other Tools

   • Cloud-based systems usually integrate well with other software, such as CRM tools, payroll systems, and third-party applications, creating a more seamless experience.

Cons of Cloud-Based Accounting Systems

1. Internet Dependency

   • Access depends on an internet connection, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity or during internet outages.

2. Recurring Costs

   • While cloud solutions often reduce upfront costs, subscription fees can accumulate over time, potentially making cloud-based systems more expensive than on-premises options in the long run.

3. Data Security Concerns

   • Despite strong security protocols, storing sensitive financial data in the cloud may still pose risks, especially if there are data breaches or cyberattacks.

4. Limited Customization

   • Cloud solutions are generally less customizable than on-premises systems. Custom features or configurations may require additional costs or may not be available.

5. Data Ownership and Portability Issues

   • Retrieving data if you decide to switch systems can be challenging, depending on the provider's policies. Additionally, exporting or transferring data might involve added steps or fees.

6. Learning Curve and Training

   • Implementing a new system can require time and training, especially if employees are unfamiliar with cloud-based platforms or if the system has unique functionalities.

7. Potential Downtime with Provider

   • If the service provider experiences downtime or maintenance issues, your access to the system is affected, which can disrupt business operations.

In summary, cloud-based accounting systems offer significant advantages in accessibility, cost management, and scalability, but they come with trade-offs around internet dependence, ongoing costs, and potential security concerns.

 

Subscription Models Ensure they Get a Slice of Profits

Top of Page

Yes, the subscription model does ensure that software providers get a continuous stream of revenue. It shifts software from being a one-time purchase to an ongoing service that the customer must continually pay for, which has both business and user implications.

From the Provider’s Perspective

1. Steady Revenue Stream

   • Subscriptions allow providers to enjoy a more predictable and recurring revenue stream, which can be more profitable over time than one-time sales.

2. Incentive for Continuous Improvement

   • The model aligns with the incentive to keep improving the product, as customers can cancel if they’re unhappy. Ideally, this drives regular updates, feature improvements, and a focus on customer satisfaction.

3. Lower Initial Cost to Attract More Customers

   • By lowering the upfront cost, subscription models appeal to businesses that may not want to or be able to invest a large amount at once. It expands the market base, especially for small and mid-sized businesses.

From the User’s Perspective

1. Ongoing Costs

   • Although lower upfront costs can be appealing, ongoing subscriptions often accumulate over time to surpass the cost of a one-time purchase. Long-term users may pay significantly more than if they had bought a license outright.

2. Reliance on Provider

   • The subscription model places users in a position of reliance on the provider. They need to trust the provider to maintain security, reliability, and access. If the provider changes policies or increases prices, customers have limited recourse.

3. Service Dependency

   • Since providers handle maintenance and updates, users often feel like they’re “renting” access to their own data and may have to keep paying even if they don’t need every feature that new updates bring.

The Subscription Balance

For many users, a subscription feels less like a service fee for value received and more like a mechanism to keep businesses “in the system.” For businesses, though, it’s a model that enables funding for continual improvements and higher customer retention. The key to an effective subscription model, from a customer perspective, lies in whether the value they receive continually justifies the cost. If not, it can feel like, indeed, the provider is simply taking a slice of the pie.

Changing Accounts System Could Cripple a Company

Top of Page

Unlike more discretionary software, an accounting system is mission-critical; businesses are highly dependent on it for day-to-day financial management, compliance, and reporting. This means that for many companies, canceling an accounting system subscription isn’t just inconvenient—it could be disastrous.

Why Canceling Isn’t a Real Option for Most Businesses

1. Data Entrenchment

   • Over time, an accounting system accumulates critical financial data, transaction history, customer and vendor records, payroll, and tax information. Migrating this data is complex and risky, making switching providers a daunting task.

2. Risk of Disruption

   • Canceling an accounting system leads to immediate operational risks. Even short disruptions can harm cash flow, payroll, and tax reporting, as well as compliance, which could lead to penalties or fines.

3. Learning Curve and Training Costs

   • Switching systems means retraining staff, re-establishing integrations, and adjusting processes, which can be costly and disruptive. Accounting software is not something that can be changed on a whim.

4. Data Portability Challenges

   • While most providers offer some form of data export, it’s rarely a seamless process. Transferring financial data from one platform to another can be labor-intensive, with risks of data loss, errors, and downtime.

5. Reinvestment Costs

   • Even if a business finds a cheaper or better solution, the costs of implementing and transitioning to a new system often outweigh any savings—especially for businesses with established operations.

The “Lock-In” Reality of Accounting Software

The lock-in effect is a real consequence of cloud-based subscription models, especially in accounting where continuity is crucial. Once businesses commit to a platform, their options to leave are limited, which can feel like a forced, perpetual subscription.

How Providers Could Build Trust in This Model

Some companies have started offering features that help customers feel less “trapped,” such as:

• Clear Data Exporting Options
  Providing user-friendly, comprehensive exporting functions to simplify migration if needed.

• Transparent Pricing
  Establishing fixed pricing plans with clear terms so customers aren’t blindsided by future hikes.

• Flexible Subscription Tiers
  Allowing businesses to scale back on features without entirely canceling the service, which can ease the financial burden if budgets tighten.

Ultimately, while cloud-based systems offer undeniable advantages, the inability to cancel without major consequences is a valid concern. Providers who recognize and address this dependency stand a better chance of gaining customer loyalty over the long haul.

Systems Development Adds Value to a Business

Top of Page

Developing an in-house accounting system can indeed add significant value to your business, especially if you’re looking for customized features, full control over your financial data, and long-term cost savings. Here are some of the key benefits and challenges of in-house accounting system development:

Value Added by In-House Accounting Systems

1. Customization and Flexibility

   • An in-house system allows you to tailor features, reports, and workflows exactly to your business’s needs, accommodating unique industry requirements or specialized processes that off-the-shelf software may not support.

2. Cost Control Over the Long Term

   • Although initial development may be costly, you avoid recurring subscription fees and the potential price hikes associated with third-party systems. This makes it a good investment for businesses planning to operate over the long term.

3. Data Security and Privacy

   • With full control over the software, you manage data storage, security protocols, and access, reducing dependency on external providers and the associated risks of data breaches or misuse.

4. Reduced Vendor Lock-In

   • In-house systems eliminate the reliance on a single vendor, so you won’t be “locked in” to any provider’s system or terms. This freedom allows you to adapt the system as your business grows and requirements evolve.

5. Alignment with Company Goals

   • You can build an accounting system that aligns directly with your business’s strategic goals, integrating it with other internal systems in a way that creates efficiencies across the board. It’s an asset that works precisely how you need it to.

6. Direct Control over Updates and Improvements

   • With an in-house team or partner, you decide when and how to improve the system, adding features as you see fit without waiting for a third-party provider’s development timeline.

Challenges of Building In-House Accounting Systems

1. High Initial Development and Maintenance Costs

   • Developing and maintaining an accounting system is resource-intensive. You’ll need skilled developers, cybersecurity expertise, and ongoing support. For some businesses, this can become a significant investment.

2. Requires Technical Expertise

   • Building an effective accounting system demands specialized knowledge in both software development and accounting practices, making it essential to have a cross-functional team with expertise in both areas.

3. Compliance and Regulatory Upkeep

   • An in-house system must be kept up-to-date with changing financial regulations, tax laws, and accounting standards. This requires a dedicated focus on compliance to avoid costly penalties.

4. Scalability and Upgradability

   • As your business grows, the system will need updates and possibly major upgrades to handle increased data volumes and transaction complexity. Scaling an in-house system can be challenging without ongoing investment.

5. Time Investment

   • Developing an in-house system takes time to design, test, and implement, which could delay the benefits you’re hoping to achieve, especially if you have immediate accounting needs.

When an In-House System is a Good Fit

An in-house accounting system is often a great choice for larger companies or those with highly specialized needs that require more control than cloud providers offer. Additionally, if you have the technical resources and are prepared to invest in long-term management, this can be a highly effective way to add value, gain autonomy, and reduce external dependencies.

For businesses with the vision, resources, and commitment to long-term management, building an in-house accounting system can be a strategic asset that aligns precisely with your needs, driving value back into your business instead of into an ongoing subscription.

Cloud-Based Systems Need Customization for any Enterprise

Top of Page

Cloud-based systems, especially for large enterprises, often require substantial customization and integration to align with the organization’s workflows, data architecture, and unique operational requirements. Off-the-shelf cloud solutions typically provide a foundation, but enterprises need specialized configurations to maximize efficiency and create a seamless fit.

Here’s why customization and integration are so critical and some common challenges enterprises face:

Why Heavy Customization is Essential for Enterprises

1. Unique Business Processes and Workflow Automation

   • Enterprises often have specialized processes that cloud systems don’t support out of the box. Customization enables the system to reflect these workflows, automating tasks, minimizing redundancies, and improving productivity.

2. Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

   • Enterprises usually operate multiple systems—ERP, CRM, HRM, supply chain management, and more. A cloud-based accounting or operations system must integrate smoothly with these to avoid silos, ensuring data flows across departments and supports comprehensive reporting.

3. Regulatory Compliance and Security Standards

   • Different industries have strict compliance needs (like HIPAA for healthcare or SOX for finance) that require precise data handling, access control, and audit trails. Customization ensures the cloud solution meets these standards.

4. Scalability and Performance Optimization

   • Enterprises manage large data volumes and high transaction rates. Customization can optimize system performance to handle this scale efficiently, ensuring the system remains responsive and reliable as the company grows.

5. Enhanced Reporting and Analytics

   • Enterprises require sophisticated reporting tailored to their metrics and KPIs. Customizing dashboards and analytics tools allows the cloud solution to deliver actionable insights specific to the organization’s strategic goals.

Key Challenges with Customization and Integration

1. High Implementation Costs and Longer Timelines

   • Customization requires skilled professionals and often involves significant time to tailor the system. Costs can quickly add up, especially if extensive development or configuration is needed.

2. Complexity of Data Migration and Integration

   • Migrating data from legacy systems to a cloud-based solution and integrating with multiple platforms can lead to compatibility issues, data integrity risks, and increased project complexity.

3. Dependency on Vendor Support and Expertise

   • Many customizations require the vendor’s support, especially for complex configurations or integrations. This dependency can slow down deployment and make the system vulnerable if vendor support is inadequate or unavailable.

4. Ongoing Maintenance and Update Conflicts

   • Customizations can complicate regular updates and patches. Each update from the vendor may affect customized features, necessitating further adjustments or testing to ensure everything functions correctly post-update.

5. Security and Compliance Risks

   • Customization opens new layers of complexity that must be secured. Enterprises need to ensure that custom integrations don’t expose vulnerabilities or create compliance gaps that could compromise sensitive data.

Balancing Customization and Enterprise Needs

Enterprises that prioritize a strategic approach to customization—focusing on critical processes, regulatory needs, and scalability—are often best positioned to get the most out of cloud-based systems. Partnering with experienced implementation teams and maintaining internal IT resources for ongoing management are also key to leveraging the full potential of customized cloud-based solutions without undermining security or stability.

Who Will Insure Us if We are not Independent?

Top of Page

Insurance companies have developed specific requirements and stipulations for cloud-dependent enterprises to mitigate risks associated with data security, privacy, compliance, and operational continuity. These stipulations generally fall under cyber insurance and technology errors & omissions (E&O) policies and address both preventative and responsive measures. Here are some of the common requirements insurers often specify for enterprises heavily reliant on cloud systems:

1. Robust Data Security and Encryption Standards

• Encryption: Data must be encrypted both in transit and at rest to safeguard sensitive information from unauthorized access.
• Access Controls: Multi-factor authentication (MFA) and strict access controls are typically required to reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
• Regular Security Audits: Insurers often require cloud-dependent enterprises to conduct regular security audits, either through third-party assessments or internal reviews, to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

2. Compliance with Data Privacy Regulations

• Regulatory Adherence: Insurance policies usually require that businesses comply with all relevant data privacy laws, such as GDPR, CCPA, or industry-specific regulations (HIPAA for healthcare, SOX for finance). Insurers may request evidence of compliance practices.
• Documentation and Reporting: Enterprises must maintain documentation of compliance efforts and processes for reporting data breaches to regulators, customers, and insurers.

3. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans

• Backup Policies: Insurers require regular data backups and a tested, documented disaster recovery plan. The backups must be stored separately (often on different servers or even in a different cloud) to ensure quick recovery in case of a breach or system failure.
• Disaster Recovery Drills: Cloud-dependent enterprises might also need to conduct regular disaster recovery drills to ensure that plans work as intended, demonstrating to insurers that they are prepared to maintain or quickly resume operations after an incident.

4. Vendor Risk Management Policies

• Due Diligence on Cloud Providers: Enterprises are expected to conduct due diligence on their cloud providers, including reviewing their security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2 compliance) and terms regarding data privacy and control.
• Third-Party Risk Management: Insurers often stipulate that companies must have vendor risk management policies, ensuring that cloud providers and other third-party vendors maintain adequate cybersecurity measures and insurance coverage.

5. Incident Response and Breach Notification Plans

• Predefined Incident Response Plans: Policies typically require enterprises to have an incident response plan specifically for cloud-based threats, such as data breaches or service outages, with steps to mitigate impact and notify stakeholders.
• Breach Notification Protocols: Companies need protocols to notify insurers promptly after a breach, typically within a specified time frame (e.g., 24-48 hours), which can impact the claim process and liability.

6. Cybersecurity Training and Awareness Programs

• Employee Training: Many insurers require enterprises to implement cybersecurity training for employees to minimize risks from phishing, social engineering, and other cyber threats.
• Regular Assessments: Insurance policies often stipulate regular assessments and updates to training programs to address emerging threats and reinforce security best practices.

7. Specific Liability Limitations and Deductibles

• Policy Exclusions: Cyber insurance policies may exclude coverage for certain types of incidents, such as those stemming from unapproved cloud vendors or non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
• Self-Retention Requirements: Some policies include high deductibles or require companies to retain a portion of the risk, especially if there are gaps in security practices, shifting more responsibility back to the enterprise.

How Insurers Support Cloud-Dependent Enterprises

Some insurers go beyond stipulations and offer support services, like risk assessments, policy compliance checklists, or access to cybersecurity consultants. By meeting these stipulations, enterprises can not only secure insurance but also better protect their data and operations, creating a more resilient cloud infrastructure.

In Conclusion

Top of Page

Cloud-based systems will often have to integrate with each other and all of these connections,whether they are TLS secured or whatever are a risk. The number of systems that you are using and the inherent performance are by no means guaranteed to be reliable or up-to-date just because they are online. Your business must insure that all cloud-based partners have sufficient measures for disaster in-place in case of the most severe disruptions. Your internet connectivity must be multi-faceted, operating over completely different physical and organisational structures so as to avoid any single dependency. An unpaid account with any supplier that offer multi-layered, multi-protocol connectivity is still a single point of failure. You have to spread the load of responsibility across multiple providers or your enterprise is always at risk.

If you are a smaller business, the cloud is a more convenient option and if you grow and sell-up then it is not your problem anyway. Systems like Xero or Quickbooks allow you to forget about backups and concentrate on growing which is what a small business needs to do. If you are a larger firm, migrating completely into the cloud is a very expensive operation but can yield a huge relief in terms of in-house IT staff costs. It is also a huge loss of in-house skill and all of your previous development costs are lost to your cloud provider as they will not be handing out any of their code next time you migrate.

Larger firms face larger problems and so there is always the case for creating a different company for each department and allowing for more flexibility.

Which ever path you decide to follow, one thing is for sure. All providers want you to pay a subscription so that when you grow, they know.